Last year we received 412 applications. We could fund 61.
This is what we did for the other 351, and why next year has to be different.
example Approved
Pilot for five design partners
Nederlandse versie →
The word for AI text so recognisable that readers drop off before the second line. At dogoda we do not do AI slop. We do AI. Because there is a way to have AI write content that fits your calendar, without the slop. Scroll along for a minute.
You open LinkedIn. Third post today that starts with "Thrilled to announce". Rocket emoji included.
Then "in today's fast-paced world", "let that sink in", and at the bottom the question nobody ever answers. One line in, you know nobody read this before it went live. Not even the sender.
That is AI slop: text generated and posted fully automatically. It takes you three seconds to spot. The sender loses their credibility even faster.
And that while today's AI models are such good writing assistants. Fast, tireless, as sharp at eight in the morning as at eleven at night. You can even feed them your own context.
So an AI-generated post is not the problem at all. The problem is copying it blindly and posting it. Use it as a first draft, keep a human in the loop, and steer it over a few iterations.
What if exactly that concept exists? And what if you are, right now, very close to becoming an exclusive design partner for it? Meet ContentOps: AI writes, you approve, nothing publishes itself.
How it works
At each step you initial it before it moves on. This is where that happens: the screens of the ContentOps console, and what you do on each.
Real screens of the console, Dutch interface
The four steps
Three directions for the topic of the week, built from your own sources. You pick one.
The opening line, the hook and the visual approach are fixed before a single word is final.
The complete post as a proof, with one revision round. Ready for production the moment you sign.
The exact package that goes live. You post it on LinkedIn yourselves.
One concept a week, four a month, each ready in time for the moment you chose in the content calendar. Nothing moves on without your approval.
For marketers and communication people who take LinkedIn seriously and refuse to publish slop under their own name. One organisation, one brand, one reviewer with editorial authority: that is the size.
In line with dogoda's mission, foundations, associations and other good-doers pay the pilot rate. Commercial teams get exactly the same workflow; we agree their rate in the first conversation.
I am looking for at most five design partners for six months. If you join, you get me with it: I set up the workflow, guard the boundaries and fold what you run into back into the next version.
EUR 950 + EUR 199 p/m pilot rate for good-doers · six months · excl. VAT and model costs
One-off setup, then a fixed monthly price for up to four LinkedIn text concepts, one revision round per concept and sixty support minutes a month. Model usage runs through your own AI account.
The arithmetic is simple. Four approved posts for 199 euro is under fifty euro a post, plus about five minutes of your day. A freelance content marketer easily costs 500 to 2,500 euro a month, and you still have to proofread them.
Since July 2026 nearly every post on my LinkedIn has gone through these four steps. I am a part-time entrepreneur with a modest network, not an influencer with a team behind me.
The numbers match that. A post of mine reaches 150 to 200 views and reliably gets a few reactions, from people who actually read it. Small, honest and mine. What you read on that page is exactly what this workflow produces.
See my LinkedIn →Yours
No small print. The base is LinkedIn text in the console. Two extensions are optional and agreed separately; the rest is deliberately outside the pilot.
A design partner uses ContentOps for their own brand and helps make the product better at the same time. That is concrete work, not an honorary title.
You run the workflow with your own brand, sources and reviewer. What has become obvious to me is not obvious to you. Those are exactly the observations I want.
Improvements land in small steps: you report what chafes, I adjust it, you run next week on the new version. No quarterly release calendar.
Which content types and channels get added (images, carousels, newsletter, other networks) we decide on what the design partners actually need, not on what is easiest to build.
After the first conversation comes a technical preflight and a quote. The pilot term only begins after a successful technical acceptance:
If acceptance is not met, the term does not start and you pay no monthly fees. That way you know up front what you are getting into, and so do I.
Tell me what you want to post about, what you expect from the tool and what success looks like on paper.
That is exactly what I take into our first conversation as preparation. It means that conversation is about your topics and your readers from the first minute, without me opening with questions you have already answered here.
I read every application myself and reply within two working days. If it is not a fit, I will say so. Prefer e-mail? bjorn@dogoda.nl
Design partner application
I will read what you wrote, look at your LinkedIn page and get back to you within two working days with a proposal for the first conversation.